Rome, Italy – The Italian government has denied the accuracy of statements attributed to the Secretary General of NATO regarding the United States’ use of military bases within Italy during recent military operations related to the war with Iran.
The government asserted that this information does not reflect reality.
Official confirmation that the rules will not be used
Italian officials clarified that military bases located on Italian soil have not been
used to conduct offensive operations or military strikes related to the conflict with Iran.
They also emphasized that Rome has not granted any such authorization during the period of escalation.
The sources added that Italy’s position on regional developments is based on supporting diplomatic efforts and de-escalating tensions.
They explained that there is a commitment to adhering to international laws and agreements governing the use of shared military facilities.
Controversy follows NATO Secretary General’s remarks
The Italian denial came after statements by the NATO Secretary General indicated
that the United States had utilized military bases in several allied countries during operations related to Iran.
Consequently, these statements raised questions within Italian political
and media circles regarding the nature of the country’s role during the crisis.
This led to demands for official clarification from the Italian government concerning any potential involvement
or military facilities provided to US forces during the period of military escalation.
Rome clings to the option of de-escalation
The Italian government affirmed that its priority remains supporting stability in the Middle East and promoting political solutions to conflicts.
It also noted that military escalation is not a sustainable path to addressing regional crises.
The government further emphasized the importance of coordination with international partners to maintain security and stability.
In addition, it stressed its continued efforts to prevent the spread of conflicts in the region.
It also reiterated that its official position remains unchanged regarding the necessity of prioritizing dialogue and diplomacy over military options.
