Washington settles the debate: Artificial intelligence does not have the right to patents.

The US position came after extensive legal reviews concluded that the title of “inventor” should be attributed only to natural persons, and not to algorithms or intelligent models, even if they are capable of producing innovative ideas or complex technological solutions.

The relevant authorities confirmed that the decision aims to preserve the traditional legal framework for innovation. It also aims to ensure clear accountability for any invention, whether in the development, registration, or legal rights pursuit phase.

This trend has sparked widespread debate within scientific and technological circles. Some experts argue that artificial intelligence has become a key player in modern innovation, and that ignoring its actual role could hinder development. Others warn that granting machines legal rights will create legislative chaos and undermine the principle of human responsibility.

The US decision comes as many countries are revising their intellectual property laws to accommodate the rapid pace of technological development. This makes the question of “who has the right to be an inventor?” a central focus of global legal debate in the coming years.