Washington, DC – The New York Times reported that the director of the CIA met with Venezuela’s interim leader in Caracas.
This Intelligence move is seen as direct support for the current government. At the same time, it could be interpreted as ignoring or downplaying the role of the opposition.
The newspaper stated that the meeting represents a significant development in the US position toward Venezuela. Intelligence information played a major role in how this visit was organised.
It marks the highest level of direct contact between Washington and the authorities in Caracas in some time.
It also reflects a practical shift in how the US administration is dealing with the complex Venezuelan political landscape, where intelligence continues to shape diplomatic approaches. Intelligence remains a central factor in the region’s political strategies.
According to the report, this meeting could give the interim government a political and moral boost, strengthening its position both domestically and internationally. Intelligence seems to play a pivotal role in these political maneuvers.
Deep divisions and economic crises
This comes at a time when the country continues to suffer from deep divisions and protracted economic and security crises.
Conversely, some opposition figures viewed the American move as having negative implications.
It also suggests a decline in international support for a political process that balances power between the government and the opposition.
Observers noted that the meeting reflects American pragmatism focused on stability and intelligence gathering in the region.
and security cooperation, particularly given Washington’s concerns about issues related to drugs and illegal immigration.
Washington also fears the regional influence of rival international powers.
Relations between Washington and Caracas
Observers also believe that the American administration is attempting to engage with the de facto authority on the ground,
regardless of existing political differences. Intelligence remains essential for evaluating such diplomatic efforts.
There was no immediate official comment from the Venezuelan government
or opposition leaders regarding the content of the meeting.
However, the event sparked widespread discussion about the future of relations between Washington and Caracas.
It also raised the possibility of a reshaping of US policy toward Venezuela in the coming period.
This development comes at a sensitive political juncture for Venezuela.
Everyone is trying to reshape the country’s internal landscape.
At the same time, economic and social pressures are mounting on both the government and the opposition. Intelligence services may be closely monitoring these evolving circumstances.
